Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
16384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2022
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.01TB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
128
SM Count
-
16384
Shading Units
-
512
TMUs
4
176
ROPs
4
512
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

443.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
1290 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
82.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
82.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1290 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

450W
TDP
Unknown
850 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
RV530
AD102-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy