Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 755M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
10368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile +5611%
43.01 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 755M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2025
Release Date
Jun 2013
GeForce 50 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR7
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.01TB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
84
SM Count
-
10752
Shading Units
384
336
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

256.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
672.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.36 GTexel/s
43.01 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
43.01 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GB203
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GT 755M
Blackwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.27 billion
377 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
10.1
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy