Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5090 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.52TB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
21712 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 5090 +109600%
109.7 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2025
Release Date
Mar 2013
GeForce 50
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1875 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR7
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1.52TB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
170
SM Count
1
21760
Shading Units
48
680
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
680
Tensor Cores
-
170
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
88 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
1714 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
109.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
109.7 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
1.714 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
19W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GB202
GPU Name
GF119
GB202-400-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Blackwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.292 billion
Unknown
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
10.1
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy