Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM GeForce2 Ultra and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 7.360GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2000
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 2
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
230 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

64MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
7.360GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

NV15
GPU Name
GT200
GeForce2 Ultra
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
Celsius
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
180 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.025 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
88 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

7.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
1.5
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
-
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy