Intel GMA 500 vs Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA 500 and 0 VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GMA 500
0.012 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
+32750%
3.942 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2008
Release Date
Dec 2023
GMA Graphics-T
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Dependent
Bandwidth
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
32
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
1
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
200.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
800.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
123.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.885 TFLOPS
12.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.942 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
65W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Poulsbo
GPU Name
Meteor Lake GT1
-
-
-
PowerVR SGX535
Architecture
Xe-LPG
Intel
Foundry
Intel
130 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.1
DirectX
12 (12_1)
ES 2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
