Intel GMA 500 vs ATI Radeon HD 3200 IGP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA 500 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 3200 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 3200 IGP 's Advantages
8 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GMA 500
0.012 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3200 IGP
+233%
0.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2008
Release Date
Mar 2008
GMA Graphics-T
Generation
TeraScale IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
32
Shading Units
40
4
TMUs
4
1
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
200.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
800.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Poulsbo
GPU Name
RS780
-
-
-
PowerVR SGX535
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
-
130 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.18 billion
Unknown
Die Size
85 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
ES 2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
