Intel GMA X4500M vs AMD FirePro A300
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA X4500M and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel GMA X4500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 65W)
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock905MHz
304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GMA X4500M
0.064 TFLOPS
FirePro A300
+985%
0.695 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
GMA Graphics-M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
760 MHz
-
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
384
10
TMUs
24
1
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
400.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
13W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Eaglelake
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
Generation 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
