Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A +1181%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Jul 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
-
6912
Shading Units
768
432
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
32
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Board Design

400W
TDP
75W
800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy