Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100B +3191%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Jan 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
4
6912
Shading Units
192
432
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
16
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

400W
TDP
55W
800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
2.1
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy