Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
6672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100B +3115%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Feb 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
5
6912
Shading Units
240
432
TMUs
40
192
ROPs
32
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

400W
TDP
75W
800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
2.1
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy