NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID A100B
+2906%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2020
Release Date
Nov 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
108
SM Count
24
6912
Shading Units
192
432
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
24
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
400W
TDP
150W
800 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
