NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1005MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
5568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID A100B
+559%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2020
Release Date
Jul 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
108
SM Count
-
6912
Shading Units
1344
432
TMUs
112
192
ROPs
32
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS
Board Design
400W
TDP
108W
800 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
