Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K2 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K2 +2761%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Jun 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1536
Shading Units
32
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G84
GK104-895-A2
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.175
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy