NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K2 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K2
+71%
2.289 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1536
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF110
GK104-895-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.175
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1
