NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K200
+694%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Dec 2009
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
1536
Shading Units
96
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.0 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
