NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 135M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 9.504GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K200
+8703%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 135M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
May 2007
GRID
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
594 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.504GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
1536
Shading Units
16
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
10W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
G86-621-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
