Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (60W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile +59%
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
May 2019
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1536
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy