Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +506%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
May 2020
GRID
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
1536
Shading Units
6912
128
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
400W
550 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy