Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro M4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro M4000M +9%
2.496 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Aug 2015
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.496 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q3-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy