Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile +374%
10.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
May 2019
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
1536
Shading Units
3072
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
113.3 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
339.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.75 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.87 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
339.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
110W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q5-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy