Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K280Q vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100

NVIDIA GRID K280Q vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K280Q and 32GB VRAM Quadro GV100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K280Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro GV100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (868.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K280Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro GV100 +627%
16.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2018
GRID
Generation
Quadro Volta
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1132 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
848 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
868.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
1536
Shading Units
5120
128
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
208.3 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
520.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.32 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.66 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.330 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GV100
-
GPU Variant
GV100-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy