Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
1464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520 +1312%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jun 2009
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
1536
Shading Units
72
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.488 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.46 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
162.0 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
45W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM4
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy