Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (108W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520 +8%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1344
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
108W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy