Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI50 +485%
13.41 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2018
GRID
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
3840
128
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Vega 20
-
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy