NVIDIA GRID K540Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K540Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K540Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K540Q
+212%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
51W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
