Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1306MHz vs 1005MHz)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020
1.672 TFLOPS
GRID A100B +730%
13.89 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

May 2016
Release Date
May 2020
GRID
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1033 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
640
Shading Units
6912
40
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
8.0
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net