NVIDIA GRID M60 1Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID M60 1Q and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M60 1Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1178MHz
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M60 1Q
4.825 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
+186%
13.82 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2021
GRID
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
7680
128
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.39 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
150.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
150.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
