Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M60 4A vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA GRID M60 4A vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1178MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M60 4A +103%
4.825 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

557 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1536
128
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.39 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
150.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
150.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy