NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 2
+650%
9.999 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jul 2011
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
16
3584
Shading Units
512
224
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GF110
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
