Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FireStream 9370
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370
+10%
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Jun 2010
H3C Graphics
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1600
48
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.154 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
