Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+6702%
2.381 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Oct 2009
H3C Graphics
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
31W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
GT216
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
