Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (219W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +282%
2.381 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Feb 2010
H3C Graphics
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
768
Shading Units
240
48
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
219W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.754 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy