Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +4860%
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Feb 2009
H3C Graphics
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
6.336GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.376 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.52 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
25W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 LE
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.181 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy