Home GPU Comparison Intel HD Graphics 3000 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Intel HD Graphics 3000 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 3000 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel HD Graphics 3000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1300MHz vs 1150MHz)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 3000
0.249 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 +195%
0.736 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jun 2013
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

650 MHz
Base Clock
200 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
96
Shading Units
320
12
TMUs
40
2
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

2.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
249.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
184.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Sandy Bridge GT2+
GPU Name
Haswell GT3e
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 6.0
Architecture
Generation 7.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
22 nm
1.16 billion
Transistors
Unknown
216 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.1
OpenGL
4.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.0
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy