Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs Intel Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 4400 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel HD Graphics 4400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 147% (2350MHz vs 950MHz)
864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 4400
0.304 TFLOPS
Arc 140T Mobile
+1483%
4.813 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2013
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
160
Shading Units
1024
20
TMUs
64
2
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
19.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
304.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
76.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT2
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
-
-
-
Generation 7.5
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
22 nm
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.0
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
