Intel Arc 140V vs Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arc 140V and 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140V 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (2050MHz vs 1800MHz)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 28W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arc 140V
+196%
4.1 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
1.382 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2024
Release Date
Dec 2023
Battlemage
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
System Shared
LPDDR5x
Memory Type
System Shared
64bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
0
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.765 TFLOPS
4.1 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1382 GFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
28W
W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 2.1
1x eDp 1.5
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
GPU Name
Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Variant
-
Xe2
Architecture
Xe-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
3 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12.2
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
