Intel Arc 140V vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arc 140V and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 640 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140V 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 86% (2050MHz vs 1100MHz)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arc 140V
+385%
4.1 TFLOPS
Iris Plus Graphics 640
0.845 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Intel Arc 140V
+719%
4222
Iris Plus Graphics 640
515
Graphics Card
Sep 2024
Release Date
Jan 2017
Battlemage
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
System Shared
LPDDR5x
Memory Type
System Shared
64bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
6
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
0
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.690 TFLOPS
4.1 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
844.8 GFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
15W
W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 2.1
1x eDp 1.5
Outputs
No outputs
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
GPU Name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GPU Variant
-
Xe2
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
3 nm
Process Size
14 nm++
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12.2
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
