CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
8176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+33422%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro FX 380 LP
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2009
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
8192
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
28W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
3
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
4
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
5
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI
6
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla P6
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy