Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Intel GMA X4500M
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 640 and 0System Shared VRAM GMA X4500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
304 additional rendering cores
Intel GMA X4500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 15W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Plus Graphics 640
+1220%
0.845 TFLOPS
GMA X4500M
0.064 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Oct 2008
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GMA Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
FSB
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
80
48
TMUs
10
6
ROPs
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
400.0 MPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
1.690 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
844.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Kaby Lake GT3e
GPU Name
Eaglelake
-
-
-
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Generation 5.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm++
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
