Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Intel Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 580 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 35W)
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 147% (2350MHz vs 950MHz)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 580
1.094 TFLOPS
Arc 140T Mobile
+339%
4.813 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Iris Pro Graphics 580
728
Arc 140T Mobile
+451%
4012
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Iris Pro Graphics 580
336
Arc 140T Mobile
+491%
1986
Graphics Card
Sep 2015
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
350 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
1024
72
TMUs
64
9
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.550 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
68.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
273.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Skylake GT4e
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
-
-
-
Generation 9.0
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm+
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
