Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Intel Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 35W)
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 114% (2350MHz vs 1100MHz)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
0.845 TFLOPS
Arc 140T Mobile
+469%
4.813 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
556
Arc 140T Mobile
+621%
4012
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
283
Arc 140T Mobile
+601%
1986
Graphics Card
Sep 2014
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
6
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
844.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Broadwell GT3e
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
-
-
-
Generation 8.0
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.0
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
