Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 80EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1300MHz vs 1100MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
0.845 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
+96%
1.664 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
556
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
+121%
1230
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
283
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
+121%
628
Graphics Card
Sep 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
40
6
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.00 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.328 TFLOPS
844.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.664 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
416.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Broadwell GT3e
GPU Name
Alder Lake GT1
-
-
-
Generation 8.0
Architecture
Generation 12.2
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.0
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
