Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1150MHz vs 1100MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile
+91%
1.408 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.736 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2020
Release Date
Jun 2013
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
200 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
320
40
TMUs
40
20
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
0 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
22.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
44.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.00 GTexel/s
2.816 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1408 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
352.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
184.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Tiger Lake GT2
GPU Name
Haswell GT3e
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Generation 7.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
22 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
146 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
