Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile vs Intel Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 35W)
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 114% (2350MHz vs 1100MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile
1.69 TFLOPS
Arc 140T Mobile
+184%
4.813 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile
1299
Arc 140T Mobile
+208%
4012
Graphics Card
Sep 2020
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
0 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
3.379 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
1.690 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
422.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Tiger Lake GT2
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
146 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
