NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU vs Intel Arc Graphics 64EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU and 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 64EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)
Intel Arc Graphics 64EU 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 106% (1900MHz vs 921MHz)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Nano GPU
0.236 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 64EU
+724%
1.946 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Oct 2024
Tegra
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
640 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
921 MHz
Boost Clock
1900 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
128
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
14.74 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
60.80 GTexel/s
471.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.891 TFLOPS
235.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.946 TFLOPS
7.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GM20B
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
TM660M-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
20 nm
Process Size
3 nm
2 billion
Transistors
17.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
243 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
5.3
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
