NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 45W)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (1400MHz vs 921MHz)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Nano GPU
0.236 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
+811%
2.15 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tegra
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
640 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
921 MHz
Boost Clock
1400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
128
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
14.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
14.74 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
471.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.301 TFLOPS
235.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
7.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GM20B
GPU Name
Alder Lake GT1
TM660M-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.2
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
20 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
5.3
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
