Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Jetson Orin NX 16 GB and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
1.88 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200 +88%
3.553 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2023
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tegra
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
32
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
29.38 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
3.760 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.880 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
940.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
GK110B
TE980M-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net