NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Jetson Orin NX 16 GB and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 420 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 40W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
+8445%
1.88 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 420
0.022 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2023
Release Date
Jan 2009
Tegra
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
8
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
32
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
29.38 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
3.760 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.880 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
940.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
25W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x VHDCI
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
G98
TE980M-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
