Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5700 and 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock993MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility FireGL V5700
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce 920MX +252%
0.508 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Mar 2016
Mobility FireGL
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
965 MHz
-
Boost Clock
993 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
256
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.944 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.83 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
508.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
15.89 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
16W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M86
GPU Name
GM108
M86-M GL (216-0683008)
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.378 billion
Transistors
Unknown
135 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy