Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5700 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility FireGL V5700
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB +3100%
4.608 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jul 2022
Mobility FireGL
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
757 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
120
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.608 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M86
GPU Name
GA107
M86-M GL (216-0683008)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.378 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
135 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy